- 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ERIC STRATFORD, Case No. 1:17-cv-00766-JDP 10 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS 11 v. CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE 12 PAUL D. BRAZELTON, et al., TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER 13 Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 14 15 Plaintiff Eric Stratford is a former state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil 16 rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint was screened on October 17 15, 2019, and plaintiff was ordered to respond within thirty days. ECF No. 20. Plaintiff, 18 however, has filed neither a response to the screening order nor a first amended complaint. 19 To manage our docket effectively, we impose deadlines and require litigants to meet 20 those deadlines. When a plaintiff fails to comply with court-imposed deadlines, the court may 21 dismiss the plaintiff’s case for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41; Hells Canyon Pres. 22 Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005) (“[T]he consensus among our 23 sister circuits, with which we agree, is that courts may dismiss under Rule 41(b) sua sponte, at 24 least under certain circumstances.”). Involuntary dismissal is a harsh penalty, but the court has 25 a duty to administer justice expeditiously and avoid needless burden for the parties. See 26 Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002); Fed. R. Civ. P. 1. 27 We will give plaintiff the opportunity to explain why the court should not dismiss his 1 | case for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff's failure to respond to this order will constitute another 2 | failure to comply with a court order and will result in dismissal of this case. Accordingly, 3 | plaintiff must show cause within thirty days of the date of entry of this order why the court 4 | should not dismiss his case for failure to prosecute. 5 6 T IS SO ORDERED. ’ : CN prssenn —_ ated: _ March 19, 2020 8 UNI STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 | No. 205. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Document Info
Docket Number: 1:17-cv-00766
Filed Date: 3/19/2020
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/19/2024