(PS) Scales v. California Bureau of Automotive Repair ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES SCALES, No. 2:18-cv-03062-MCE-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 CALIFORNIA BUREAU OF AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On January 24, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 18 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 19 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 20 Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 21 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 22 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 23 1983). 24 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 25 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 2 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed January 24, 2020, are ADOPTED. 3 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 4 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 DATED: March 24, 2020 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28