Allen v. OneMain Financial Group, LLC ( 2020 )

L. Paul Mankin (SBN 264038) 1 Joseph Rocco (SBN 326862) 2 The Law Office of L. Paul Mankin 3 4655 Cass Street, Suite 410 San Diego, CA 92109 4 pmankin@paulmankin.com 5 jrocco@paulmankin.com Tel: 800-219-3577 6 Fax: 323-207-3885 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 DENISE ALLEN, ) Case No. 1:19-CV-01720-LJO-JLT ) 13 Plaintiff, ) 14 ) JOINT STIPULATION AND; vs. ) ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION 15 ONE MAIN FINANCIAL, and DOES 1 ) 16 through 10, inclusive, ) 17 ) Defendant. ) 18 ) 19 ) ) 20 ) 21 ) 22 The parties to this action, acting through counsel, and pursuant to Federal 23 24 Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) hereby stipulate, in consideration of a 25 negotiated settlement executed by them, to the Dismissal With Prejudice of this 26 27 action, including all claims stated herein against all parties, with each party to 28 bear its own attorney's fees and costs. Dated: March 26th, 2020 1 2 By: /s/L. Paul Mankin 3 L. Paul Mankin 4 The Law Office of L. Paul Mankin 5 Attorney for Plaintiff 6 Dated: March 26th, 2020 7 8 By: /s/Jordan Yu 9 10 Jordan Yu Yu | Mohandesi LLP 11 Attorney for Defendant 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Filed electronically on this 26th day of March 2020, with: 1 2 United States District Court CM/ECF system 3 Notification sent electronically via the Court’s ECF system to: 4 5 Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston United States District Court 6 Eastern District of California 7 Jordan S. Yu, Esq, 8 Yu | Mohandesi LLP 9 633 W. 5th St., Ste. 2800 10 Los Angles, CA 90071 11 This 26th Day of March 2020 12 /s/L. Paul Mankin 13 L. Paul Mankin 14 // 15 // 16 // 17 // // 18 // 19 // // 20 // 21 // 22 // // 23 // 24 // // 25 // 26 // 27 // // 28 // 1 The parties have settled their case and have stipulated to the action being dismissed with 2 prejudice and with each side to bear their own fees and costs. (Doc. 9) The Federal Rules of 3 Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order. 4 Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court 5 is DIRECTED to assign a district judge for the purpose of closing this case and then to close 6 this action. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: March 26, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 10 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28