(PC) Bontemps v. Narinder ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY C. BONTEMPS, No. 2:19-cv-2605 TLN CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 NARINDER SAUKHLA, 15 Defendant. 16 17 By an order filed February 12, 2020, plaintiff was ordered to pay the filing fee within 18 thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this 19 action be dismissed. ECF No. 5. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not 20 paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 22 prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 24 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days 25 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 26 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections 27 //// 28 //// 1 | to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 2 | objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 3 | Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 | Dated: March 30, 2020 f° Lf i, / CAN fu fl. ay CAROLYN K. DELANEY 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 | 13:bont2605.no.fee.f&r 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28