(PS) Bledsoe v. Guiliani ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONNELL BLEDSOE, No. 2:19-cv-02553-TLN-CKD 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 JUDGE GUILIANI, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Donnell Bledsoe (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, brings this civil action titled 18 “PETITION TO THE SUPREME COURT JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT OBSTRUCTION OF 19 JUSTICE HIGH CRIES AND MISDEMEANORS VIOLATION OF THE ORGANIZED 20 CRIME ACT OF (1970) RICO ACT FRAUD, BRIBERY AND ABSENCE OF 21 JURISDICTION.” The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 22 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 23 On January 23, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which 24 were served on the Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 25 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 3.) No objections were filed. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 2 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 3 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 4 1983); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 5 Having reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards, the Court finds the Findings 6 and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 8 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed January 23, 2020 (ECF No. 3), are 9 ADOPTED. 10 2. Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED without leave to amend. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 DATED: April 7, 2020 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28