(PC) Sekona v. Hernandez ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ETUATE SEKONA, No. 2:17-cv-0346-KJM-EFB P 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 13 JOE LIZARRAGA, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. The court has determined that this case will benefit from a settlement conference. 18 Therefore, this case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney to conduct a 19 settlement conference at the U. S. District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California 95814 in 20 Courtroom #24 on May 18, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. All parties shall appear by telephonic- 21 conferencing. 22 A separate order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum will issue concurrently with 23 this order. 24 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. 26 Delaney on May 18, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom #24 at the U. S. District Court, 27 501 I Street, Sacramento, California 95814. 1 2. All parties shall appear by telephonic-conferencing. No later than 9:30 a.m., parties 2 shall call 1-877-848-7030 and when prompted, use the access code 7431521 plus #, 3 and security code 4223 plus #. 4 3. Parties are instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present at the 5 Settlement Conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. The 6 individual with full authority to settle must also have “unfettered discretion and 7 authority” to change the settlement position of the party, if appropriate. The purpose 8 behind requiring the attendance of a person with full settlement authority is that the 9 parties’ view of the case may be altered during the face to face conference. An 10 authorization to settle for a limited dollar amount or sum certain can be found not to 11 comply with the requirement of full authority to settle1. 12 4. Parties are directed to submit confidential settlement statements no later than May 11, 13 2020 to ckdorders@caed.uscourts.gov. Plaintiff shall mail his confidential settlement 14 statement Attn: Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney, USDC CAED, 501 I Street, 15 Suite 4-200, Sacramento, California 95814 so it arrives no later than May 11, 2020. 16 The envelope shall be marked “CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT STATEMENT.” 17 Parties are also directed to file a “Notice of Submission of Confidential Settlement 18 Statement” (See L.R. 270(d)). 19 20 21 1 While the exercise of its authority is subject to abuse of discretion review, “the district court has the authority to order parties, including the federal government, to participate in mandatory settlement 22 conferences… .” United States v. United States District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands, 694 F.3d 1051, 1053, 1057, 1059 (9th Cir. 2012)(“the district court has broad authority to compel participation in mandatory 23 settlement conference[s].”). The term “full authority to settle” means that the individuals attending the mediation conference must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any 24 settlement terms acceptable to the parties. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989), cited with approval in Official Airline Guides, Inc. v. Goss, 6 F.3d 1385, 1396 (9th Cir. 1993). 25 The individual with full authority to settle must also have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the settlement position of the party, if appropriate. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz. 2003), amended on recon. in part, Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 2003 WL 23353478 (D. Ariz. 2003). The 26 purpose behind requiring the attendance of a person with full settlement authority is that the parties’ view of the case may be altered during the face to face conference. Pitman, 216 F.R.D. at 486. An authorization to 27 settle for a limited dollar amount or sum certain can be found not to comply with the requirement of full authority to settle. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 596-97 (8th Cir. 2001). 1 Settlement statements should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on 2 any other party. Settlement statements shall be clearly marked “confidential” with 3 the date and time of the settlement conference indicated prominently thereon. 4 5 The confidential settlement statement shall be no longer than five pages in length, 6 typed or neatly printed, and include the following: 7 8 a. A brief statement of the facts of the case. 9 b. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, 1.e., statutory or other grounds upon 10 which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties’ likelihood of 11 prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in 12 dispute. 13 c. summary of the proceedings to date. 14 d. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial, and 15 trial. 16 e. The relief sought. 17 f. The party’s position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a 18 history of past settlement discussions, offers, and demands. 19 g. A brief statement of each party’s expectations and goals for the settlement 20 conference, including how much a party is willing to accept and/or willing to pay. 21 h. Ifthe parties intend to discuss the joint settlement of any other actions or claims 22 not in this suit, give a brief description of each action or claim as set forth above, 23 including case number(s) if applicable. 24 || DATED: April 10, 2020. 25 tid, PDEA 26 EDMUND F. BRENNAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28