Farias v. Shell Pipeline Company ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | MARY LOU FARIAS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00377-NONE-EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 13 v. DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 14 | SHELL PIPELINE COMPANY, L-P., et al., 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 13) 16 17 Plaintiff, Mary Lou Farias, and Defendant, Shell Pipeline Company L.P., have filed a 18 | stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice. (ECF No. 13). In light of the stipulation, 19 | the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. 20 | City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is 21 | respectfully directed to close this case. 22 T IS SO ORDERED. 23 24] Dated: _ April 13, 2020 [spe ey — 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28