Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Louis ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC., Case No. 1:19-cv-01537-NONE-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND DIRECTING CLERK 13 v. OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST DOCKET TO REFLECT 14 RENZO EDWARD LOUIS, et al., VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 12, 13, 14) 16 17 Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on October 30, 2019. (ECF No. 18 1.) After Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement, an order was filed on January 10, 2020 requiring 19 Plaintiff to file dispositional documents on or before April 10, 2020. (ECF Nos. 7,8.) When 20 Plaintiff failed to file dispositional documents, an order to show cause issued on April 14, 2020. 21 (ECF No. 12.) On April 15, 2020, Plaintiff filed a response to the order to show cause and a 22 notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 23 (ECF Nos. 13-15.) The notice of voluntary dismissal states that this action is to be dismissed 24 with prejudice with each party to bear its own costs. 25 The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s response and shall discharge the April 14, 2020 order 26 to show cause. 27 “[U]nder Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), ‘a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.’ ” wOAOe 4b UV VEO FOAL SAR MU IR Na eA ee 1 | Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) 2 | (quoting Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997)). The Ninth Circuit has 3 | held that Rule 41(a) allows a plaintiff to dismiss without a court order any defendant who has yet 4 | to serve an answer or motion for summary judgment. Pedrina v. Chun, 987 F.2d 608, 609 (9th 5 | Cir. 1993). “[A] dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is effective on filing, no court order is required, 6 | the parties are left as though no action had been brought, the defendant can’t complain, and the 7 | district court lacks jurisdiction to do anything about it.” Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc., 193 8 | F.3d at 1078. In this action, no defendant has filed an answer or other responsive pleading. 9 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 10 1. The order to show cause, filed April 14, 2020, is DISCHARGED; and 11 2. the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to assign a district judge to this case for the 12 purpose of closing the case and then to adjust the docket to reflect voluntary 13 dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. ee 16 | Dated: _ April 15, 2020 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28