(PC) Callins v. Stainer ( 2020 )

41.4970 UV VUtTtOL YAALY Lr NY MVVULIICEI Vy PHU Veni corey Payee +ViIs+ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | CARLTON R. CALLINS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00431-DAD-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 13 v. DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 14] J. ESCUTIA, et al., (ECF No. 55) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, Carlton R. Callins, and Defendants Cervantes, Padilla, Lopez, Escutia, Guzman 18 | and Pena, have filed a stipulation to dismiss all claims with prejudice. (ECF No. 45.) Pursuant 19 | to the stipulation, the case has ended and the case is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. 20 | P.41(a)C1); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 21 IS SO ORDERED. 22 23| Dated: _ April 28, 2020 [see ey UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28