(PC) Gonzalez v. Price ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL HERNANDEZ GONZALEZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-00653-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 v. 14 PRICE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Michael Hernandez Gonzalez (“Plaintiff”), a resident of Atascadero State 18 Hospital proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together 19 with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 20 The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity 21 jurisdiction, be brought only in “(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all 22 defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located, (2) a judicial district in which 23 a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part 24 of the property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) if there is no district in which an 25 action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any 26 defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to such action.” 28 U.S.C. 27 § 1391(b). 28 /// 1 In this case, none of the defendants appear to reside in this district. The claims arose in 2 San Luis Obispo County, which is in the Central District of California. Therefore, plaintiff’s 3 claim should have been filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of 4 California. In the interest of justice, a federal court may transfer a complaint filed in the wrong 5 district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); Ravelo Monegro v. Rosa, 211 F.3d 509, 6 512 (9th Cir. 2000). 7 Accordingly IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 8 1. This matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of 9 California; and 10 2. This Court has not yet ruled on Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 11 2.) 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 Dated: May 11, 2020 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 1:20-cv-00653

Filed Date: 5/11/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/19/2024