(PC) Goodson v. Colusa County Superior Courts ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY GOODSON, No. 2:20-cv-0679-EFB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 COLUSA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURTS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 6, 2020, the court found that plaintiff’s request for leave to proceed in 20 forma pauperis was not accompanied by a certified trust account statement, as required by 28 21 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). ECF No. 4. 22 Accordingly, the court directed plaintiff to submit, within thirty days, a certified trust 23 account statement to complete his request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Id. The court 24 also warned plaintiff that failure to do so would result in this action being dismissed. Id. The 25 time for acting has now passed and plaintiff has not submitted the certified trust account 26 statement or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 27 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to randomly assign a United States 28 District Judge to this case. 2 OU UVM EE OING INI ER MVOC OI ee AY 1 Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 2 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 3 || assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days 4 || after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 5 || objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 6 || “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 7 || objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 8 || parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 9 | appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 10 | v. Vist, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 11 || Dated: May 18, 2020. 12 Boat, See i 13 EDMUND F. BRENNAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28