(PC) Morris v. Rodriguez ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CONDALEE MORRIS, No. 2:18-cv-2849-WBS-EFB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 E. RODRIGUEZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 21, 2020, defendants Ortiz, Clough, Murillo, Allison and Rodriguez 19 filed a motion to dismiss. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or a 20 statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motion. 21 In cases in which one party is incarcerated and proceeding without counsel, motions 22 ordinarily are submitted on the record without oral argument. Local Rule 230(l). “Opposition, if 23 any, to the granting of the motion shall be served and filed by the responding party not more than 24 twenty-one (21), days after the date of service of the motion.” Id. A responding party’s failure 25 “to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any 26 opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in the imposition of sanctions.” Id. 27 Furthermore, a party’s failure to comply with any order or with the Local Rules “may be 28 grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or wOAOe 6. LO UV MEO VV RYE RD MVMVUIEOCIT CY POC Vee □□ OV! 1 | within the inherent power of the Court.” E.D. Cal. Local Rule 110. The court may recommend 2 | that an action be dismissed with or without prejudice, as appropriate, if a party disobeys an order 3 || or the Local Rules. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1263 (9th Cir. 1992) (district court did 4 | not abuse discretion in dismissing pro se plaintiffs complaint for failing to obey an order to re- 5 || file an amended complaint to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure); Carey v. King, 856 6 | F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988) (dismissal for pro se plaintiffs failure to comply with local 7 | rule regarding notice of change of address affirmed). 8 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that, within 21 days of the date of this order, 9 | plaintiff shall file either an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of no opposition. 10 || Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed 11 | without prejudice. 12 | DATED: May 26, 2020. tid, PDEA 13 EDMUND F. BRENNAN 14 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28