(PC) Gomez v. CDCR ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDWARD GOMEZ, No. 2: 17-cv-1247 JAM KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CDCR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed February 28, 2020, this court directed plaintiff to file a pretrial statement on 18 or before May 16, 2020. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. The court will therefore 19 recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule 20 110. 21 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. Defendants are relieved from filing a pretrial statement. 23 2. The pretrial conference set for June 13, 2020, is vacated; and 24 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 25 Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule 110. 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty days after 28 being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with MAS LET □□ EAINTTING IN RATIO VO POO ee □□□ ove 1 | the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to 2 | Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be 3 | filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that 4 | failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 5 | Court’s order. Martinez v. Y1st, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 | Dated: May 27, 2020 Fens Arn 8 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 Gom1247.fpt 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28