(PC) Scruggs v. Torrez ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARTAY LAVONCE SCRUGGS, No. 2:20-cv-0718 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND 13 v. RECOMMENDATIONS 14 DR. TORREZ, 15 Defendant. 16 17 By an order filed April 14, 2020, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma 18 pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of his prison trust account statement, or pay the court’s 19 filing fee of $400.00, and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation 20 that this action be dismissed. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not 21 responded to the court’s order and has not filed the required documents or paid the required filing 22 fee. 23 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 24 directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 25 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty days after 28 being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with wOASe 2 OU UV ELOCINGINITING IN RATIO OIC ee OY ee 1 | the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 2 | “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 3 | failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 4 | Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 | Dated: May 27, 2020 ° Fens Arn 7 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 /scru0718.fifp 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28