(PC) Merriman v. Love ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DOMINIQUE MERRIMAN, No. 2:19-cv-01443-TLN-CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 REBECCA LOVE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Dominique Merriman (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed 18 this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On April 9, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were 21 served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff has not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 25 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 26 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 27 1983); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 28 /// 1 Having reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards, the Court finds the Findings 2 and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed April 9, 2020 (ECF No. 15) are adopted in 5 full; and 6 2. All Defendants and claims other than Plaintiff’s claim arising under the Eighth 7 Amendment against Defendants Love and Sullivan are DISMISSED. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 DATED: May 27, 2020 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28