(PC) Fowler v. Jones ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEANDRE FOWLER, No. 2:20-cv-0555 JAM CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SCOTT JONES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The 18 matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and 19 Local Rule 302. 20 On April 27, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the 23 findings and recommendations. 24 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and 25 recommendations was returned by the U.S. Postal Service, plaintiff was properly served. It is the 26 plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to 27 Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 28 ///// 1 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 2 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 3 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having 4 reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record 5 and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 27, 2020, are adopted in full; and 8 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. 9 DATED: June 1, 2020 10 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28