(PS) Schmitz v. Asman ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS SCHMITZ, et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-00195-JAM-CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT 13 LIZARRAGA’S MOTION FOR AN v. ORDER INSTRUCTING THE CLERK 14 TO REDACT PROOF OF SERVICE 15 A. ASMAN, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Defendant Lizarraga moves for an order instructing the Clerk to redact his home address 19 from the proof of service previously filed with the Court (ECF No. 13 at 2). 20 After full consideration, and good cause appearing, the Court grants Defendant’s motion. 21 Defendant is a peace officer, and disclosure of his home addresses violates the public policy of 22 confidentiality, and jeopardizes Defendant’s safety and security. Hackett v. Superior Court, 13 23 Cal.App.4th 96, 100 (1993); Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 24 2003). Further, defendants’ counsel have represented that they contacted the plaintiffs who have no 25 objection to this request. 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// wOAIe 2 OU VEY EY EAINT NS INES MUO Bo PI eA ee 1 After full consideration, and good cause appearing, the Court grants Defendant Lizarraga’s 2 | motion (ECF No. 31). The Clerk is instructed to redact Defendant Lizarraga’s address from 3 | Docket No. 13 at page 2. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 | Dated: June 3, 2020 es id Kt | i { p 6 CAROLYN K. DELANEY 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28