(PC) Tolliver v. County of Sacramento ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RESHON TOLLIVER, No. 2:19-cv-2599 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se in an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. Plaintiff requests that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to require 19 counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. 20 Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request an attorney 21 to voluntarily represent such a plaintiff. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 22 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). 23 When determining whether “exceptional circumstances” exist, the court must consider plaintiff’s 24 likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro 25 se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 26 (9th Cir. 2009) (district court did not abuse discretion in declining to appoint counsel). The 27 burden of demonstrating exceptional circumstances is on the plaintiff. Id. Circumstances 28 common to most prisoners, such as lack of legal education and limited law library access, do not wMOADe 2 LDV MEPS NE MMU PI eA eV 1 | establish exceptional circumstances that warrant a request for voluntary assistance of counsel. 2 Having considered the factors under Palmer, the court finds that plaintiff has failed to 3 | meet his burden of demonstrating exceptional circumstances warranting the appointment of 4 | counsel at this time. 5 Plaintiff has also filed a motion for extension of time to file an amended complaint. Good 6 || cause appearing, that request will be granted. 7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 8 1. Plaintiffs request for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 10) is denied without 9 | prejudice; 10 2. Plaintiffs motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 10) is granted; and 11 3. Plaintiff is granted one hundred and twenty days from the date of this order in which to 12 | file an amended complaint. 13 | Dated: June 5, 2020 eo dp. A Gx CAROLYN K DELANEY 15 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 12/toN2599.31+36 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 2:19-cv-02599

Filed Date: 6/5/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/19/2024