Price Simms Holdings LLC v. Candle3, LLC ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PRICE SIMMS HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., No. 2:18-cv-1851-WBS-KJN 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER AFTER TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE 13 v. (ECF Nos. 109-115.) 14 CANDLE3, LLC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On December 13, 2019, plaintiffs/counter-defendants PriceSimms Holdings, et al., filed a 18 motion to compel discovery responses from defendant/counter-claimant Candle3, and set it for a 19 January 16, 2020 hearing before the undersigned. (ECF No. 97.) Therein, PriceSimms contended 20 Candle3 had not responded to a number of discovery requests. (Id.) However, a few weeks prior, 21 Counsel for Candle3 moved to withdraw, and so the undersigned concluded that resolution of the 22 motion should be delayed until after Candle3’s representation was sorted. (ECF No. 103.) 23 In February of 2020, the district judge permitted Candle3’s counsel to withdraw on the 24 understanding that Attorney Erin Jensen would be filing a pro hac vice application and 25 substituting his appearance. (ECF Nos. 107, 109.) However, no counsel entered, and so Candle3 26 has been without representation since February—which has left it unable to “file any pleadings, 27 make or oppose any motions, or present any evidence to contest liability.” See Caveman Foods, 28 LLC v. Ann Payne’s Caveman Foods, LLC, 2015 WL 6736801, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2015). WwAOe 6. VEO A VV DOING RVVUIEIOCI boa POR ee AY ee 1 Because PriceSimms’s motion to compel had not been resolved, the undersigned ordered 2 | the parties to file status updates with the court. (ECF No. 111.) PriceSimms responded, noting 3 | that the discovery they are seeking is still outstanding. (ECF No. 112.) PriceSimms requested a 4 | telephonic hearing at the court’s earliest convenience in order to move the issue forward. (Id.) 5 | The court’s order was mailed directly to Candle3’s Colorado address, but returned as 6 | undeliverable. After that occurred, the court ordered a telephonic status conference be held, and 7 | directed the clerk of the court to serve Candle3 at both of its registered addresses (in Colorado 8 || and Irvine, California). (See ECF Nos 114, 115.) 9 On June 10, 2020, the court held a telephonic status conference to discuss these matters. 10 | Counsel for PriceSimms appeared, and Mr. Jensen appeared. (ECF No. 116.) Mr. Jensen 11 | confirmed that he is not and will not be representing Candle3, and the court excused him from the 12 || proceedings. Thereafter, the court queried PriceSimms how it intended to proceed with the case. 13 | PriceSimms stated it intended to move for an entry of default on its claims against Candle3, and 14 | move for Candle3’s counterclaims to be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The court instructed 15 | PriceSimms to file its motion within two weeks, and informed counsel that this forthcoming 16 | motion should be served on Candle3 at both the Colorado and Irvine addresses (2222 Martin St 17 | #214, Irvine, CA 92612, and 4060 S. Kalamath St., Englewood, CO 80110). 18 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 19 1. Within two weeks of this order, PriceSimms shall file its motion regarding both its 20 claims and Candle3’s counterclaims, and shall notice the motion for a hearing 21 pursuant to Local Rule 230. The motion shall be served on Candle3 at both of its 22 addresses, as detailed above; and 23 2. The Clerk of the Court shall serve this order on Candle3 at both of its addresses. 24 | Dated: June 10, 2020 Foci) Aharon 26 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 pric.1851 28