(PC) Chappa v. Vangerwin ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY CHAPPA, No. 2:20-cv-0413 JAM KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 VANGERWIN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate, proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis. 18 Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed March 30, 2020, plaintiff’s 19 complaint was dismissed and sixty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Sixty 20 days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or 21 otherwise responded to the court’s order. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 23 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 28 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 2 OYUN MUTT EAINTT IN RYUUUEIOCTI OYe 1 | failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 2 | Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 | Dated: June 10, 2020 ‘ Frese Arn 5 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 | chap0413.fta 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28