(PC)Haygood v. Newsom ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DEON HAYGOOD, No. 2:20-cv-0239-EFB P 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff proceeds without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This 17 proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 18 On April 22, 2020, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 19 § 1915A. ECF No. 6. The court dismissed the complaint, explained the deficiencies therein, and 20 granted plaintiff thirty days in which to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies. Id. 21 The screening order warned plaintiff that failure to comply would result in a recommendation that 22 this action be dismissed. The time for acting has now passed and plaintiff has not filed an 23 amended complaint. Thus, it appears that plaintiff is unable or unwilling to cure the defects in the 24 complaint. 25 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to randomly assign a United States 26 District Judge to this action. 27 ///// 28 ///// 2 OU UV PRINCE RB MVUEEIOCTI A PUA tere POY ee 1 Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice for the 2 || reasons set forth in the April 22, 2020 screening order (ECF No. 6). 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 4 | assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days 5 || after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 6 || objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 7 | “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 8 || objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 9 || parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 10 || appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 11 | v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 12 | Dated: June 12, 2020. 13 tid, PDEA EDMUND F. BRENNAN 14 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28