Mastronardi International Limited v. SunSelect Produce (California), Inc. ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MASTRONARDI INTERNATIONAL CASE NO. 1:18-CV-00737-AWI-JLT LIMITED, 12 ORDER AFTER TELEPHONIC Plaintiff, CONFERENCE; ORDER 13 CONSOLIDATING THE ACTIONS v. 14 SUNSELECT PRODUCE (CALIFORNIA), 15 INC., 16 Defendant. 17 18 SUNSELECT PRODUCE, CASE NO. 1:20-cv-00735 DAD JLT 19 Plaintiff, 20 v. 21 MASTRONARDI INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, 22 Defendant. 23 24 The Court held an informal, telephonic conference (Doc. 68.) At the conference, counsel 25 agreed that the cases are not in a settlement posture but would be more likely to settle after a 26 determination as to the significance of the foreign arbitration award. They agreed also that the 27 cases should be consolidated for all purposes. 1 The Court may consolidate actions involving a common question of law or fact, and 2 consolidation is proper when it serves the purposes of judicial economy and convenience. 3 Fed.R.Civ.P. 42(a). The Ninth Circuit explained that the Court “has broad discretion under this rule to 4 consolidate cases pending in the same district.” Investors Research Co. v. United States District Court 5 for the Central District of California, 877 F.2d 777 (9th Cir. 1989). In determining whether to 6 consolidate actions, the Court weighs the interest of judicial convenience against the potential for 7 delay, confusion, and prejudice caused by consolidation. Southwest Marine, Inc., v. Triple A. Mach. 8 Shop, Inc., 720 F. Supp. 805, 807 (N.D. Cal. 1989). In these actions, the plaintiffs bring similar 9 claims and they present similar questions of fact and law. 10 Consolidation would serve the purposes of minimizing judicial resources, and the Court anticipates little risk of delay, confusion, or prejudice if the matters are consolidated. Consequently, 11 consolidation is appropriate. See Pierce v. County of Orange, 526 F.3d 1190, 1203 (9th Cir. 2008). 12 Therefore, the Court ORDERS: 13 1. The settlement conference will not be reset. However, counsel may jointly request a 14 settlement conference when they believe the case is in a settlement posture; 15 2. Counsel SHALL submit a stipulation related to their desire to file more than one 16 dispositive motion for the Court’s consideration; 17 3. The cases are ordered consolidated for all purposes, including trial; 18 4. The parties are instructed that all future filings SHALL use the caption set forth 19 above in the earlier-filed cases and SHALL use case number 1:18-CV-00737-AWI-JLT. 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated: June 13, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27