(PS)Briggs v. UNESCO ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VICKI BRIGGS, No. 2:20-cv-00494-TLN-CKD 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 UNESCO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Vicki Briggs (“Plaintiff”), an individual proceeding pro se, brings this civil 18 action against Defendants UNESCO, Bank of America, Chamber of Commerce, and Sutter 19 Health Foundation. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 20 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On May 13, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 22 were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 23 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff did not file 24 objections to the Findings and Recommendations. 25 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 26 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 27 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 28 1983); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 1 Having reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards, the Court finds the Findings 2 and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed May 13, 2020, are adopted in full. 5 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 6 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 DATED: June 15, 2020 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28