(PC) Hill v. Diaz ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CYMEYON HILL, No. 2:20-cv-0843 TLN CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 RALPH M. DIAZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed May 5, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to 18 file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has 19 not filed an amended complaint. 20 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 21 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 23 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after 24 being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 25 the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 26 Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 27 ///// 28 ///// VASE CODY ONTO PINOY INE MMV UTI OG POM Ee oe 1 | waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 2 | 1991). 3 | Dated: June 16, 2020 Lad | Cardp. k. □□□ CAROLYN K. DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8] 4 9 nillO843 fta 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28