(PC) Khouanmany v. Alencastre ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VILAYCHITH KHOUANMANY, No. 2:17-cv-01326-TLN-EFB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 UNITED STATES MARSHALS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with an action brought under Bivens v. Six 18 Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On May 6, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 26 file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 27 proper analysis. 28 /// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 6, 2020, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 3 2. All claims in the third amended complaint, other than Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment 4 sexual assault claims against Defendants Deppe and Alencastre, are DISMISSED without leave to 5 amend. 6 DATED: June 19, 2020 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28