(PS) Sharma v. Griswold ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NARENDRA SHARMA, No. 2:19–cv–1731–MCE–KJN (PS) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. (ECF Nos. 10, 21) 14 RICHARDSON C. GRISWOLD, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On March 27, 2020 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 18 21), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 19 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were 20 filed. 21 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 22 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 23 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 24 1983). 25 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 26 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Further, the 27 court reinforces the statements made by the magistrate judge in his findings and 28 recommendations, as well as those made by other judges of this court, that plaintiff Sharma shall wOAOe 2 LUV VEEP OLIVINE EING RAUF ee PY ee 1 | refrain from filing cases in this court on behalf of the Thakor’s. (See Case No. 2:19-cv—601- 2 || TLN—-DB at ECF No. 24; see also Id. at ECF No. 27.) 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 21) are ADOPTED in full; 5 2. Defendant Griswold’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED; 6 3. Sharma’s First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with PREJUDICE; and 7 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: June 26, 2020 10 f (Cota Ze 5 □ MORRISON C. ENGLAID, J 11 UNITED STATES DISTRI 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28