Scottsdale Indemnity Company v. Yamada ( 2020 )

4.140 UV VVUOUL LYAALY LE NY bMVVUPPIOiit Jt Vifledicy Payee +ViIs+ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SCOTTSDALE INDEMNITY No. 1:18-cv-00801-DAD-EPG COMPANY, 12 ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR Plaintiff, DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH 13 PREJUDICE v. 14 (ECF No. 50) 5 JASON M. YAMADA, et al. Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff and Defendants have filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with 18 | prejudice. (ECF No. 134). In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with 19 | prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 20 | 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 | Dated: _ July 22, 2020 [Je hey UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28