Palacios v. United States ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN DOE, Case No. 1:20-cv-01052-NONE-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT 13 v. ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS 14 UNITED STATES, FIVE DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendant. 16 17 On July 29, 2020, John Doe (“Plaintiff”), a federal prisoner, filed this action pursuant to 18 the Federal Tort Claims Act alleging claims of negligence. Along with his complaint, Plaintiff 19 filed a motion to file the complaint under a pseudonym, a request to seal documents, and notice of 20 related case.1 (ECF Nos. 1-4.) On July 30, 2020, the Clerk of the Court issued a notice directing 21 Plaintiff’s attorney, E.J Hurst to submit a pro hac vice application and pay the fee. (ECF No. 5.) 22 On July 31, 2020, an order issued granting Plaintiff’s request to seal and he was directed to email 23 the declaration of identity to the Court within two days. (ECF No. 8.) 24 Plaintiff’s counsel has not submitted a pro hac vice application, paid the fee, emailed the 25 document to be filed under seal, or otherwise responded to the Court’s orders. 26 1 The Court notes that the related case was closed on August 4, 2020, and Plaintiff’s motion to 27 proceed under a pseudonym was denied as moot. See Doe v. Kane, No. 1:19-cv-00467-DAD- BAM (E.D. Cal.). No notice of related case has been filed in that action for the district judge to 28 determine whether to relate the cases prior to dismissal of the action. wOAOe UVM LYON PAI MIU OO OI Ee OY ee 1 Local Rule 110 provides that “[flailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules 2 | or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all 3 | sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to 4 | control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, 5 | including dismissal of the action. Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 6 | 2000). 7 Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING within 8 || five (5) days of the date of entry of this order why sanctions, up to and including dismissal of this 9 | action, should not issue for the failure to comply. Plaintiff is forewarned that the failure to 10 | show cause may result in the imposition of sanctions, including the dismissal of this action 11 | for failure to prosecute. 12 B IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. ee 14 | Dated: _ August 7, 2020 Is UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28