(PC) Haywood v. California Department of Insurance ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERICA D. HAYWOOD, No. 2:20-cv-1122 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS INSURANCE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On June 29, 2020, plaintiff was ordered to submit a certified copy of her jail trust account 18 statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of plaintiff’s complaint. 19 Plaintiff was warned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be 20 dismissed without prejudice. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not 21 responded to the court’s order. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 23 court judge to this case; and 24 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 25 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 28 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections wOAOe 2 OU UVM PRIN INES MVOC PIO VO ee OY ev 1 | with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 2 | and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 3 | time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Y1st, 951 F.2d 1153 4 | (9th Cir. 1991). 5 | Dated: August 11, 2020 i; dp. | bie 6 CAROLYN DELANEY 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 | , hayw1122.fifp 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28