Horton v. Charter Communications Inc. ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JACK HORTON, Case No. 1:18-cv-01518-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 13 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) 14 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 15 Defendant. (ECF No. 41) 16 17 Jack Horton (“Plaintiff”) filed this action in the Superior Court for the State of California, 18 County of Kings against Charter Communications Inc., Advance/Newhouse Partnership, and 19 Bright House Networks, LLC. (ECF No. 1 at 25-27.) On November 1, 2018, Defendants 20 Charter Communications Inc. and Bright House Networks, LLC removed the action to the 21 Eastern District of California. (ECF No. 1.) Defendants Advance/Newhouse Partnership and 22 Bright House Networks, LLC have previously been voluntarily dismissed from this action. (ECF 23 Nos. 28, 32.) Charter Communications, Inc. is the sole remaining defendant. 24 On August 14, 2020, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice as the 25 parties have reached a settlement of all claims between them. In light of the stipulation of the 26 parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San 27 Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. / / / WAOw 40°UV YIN MVVUPTIOCII To PR □□□ THe PAY eV 1 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 2 | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. □□ (Se 5 | Dated: _ August 14, 2020 OF ‘ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28