(PS) King v. Indy Mac Bank FSB ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEVIN KING, No. 2:18-cv-727-JAM-EFB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 INDY MAC BANK FSB, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action without counsel. On November 6, 2019, the postal 18 service returned documents directed to plaintiff as “Undeliverable, Moved-Left No Address.” A 19 party appearing without counsel must keep the court and all parties apprised of her current 20 address. E.D. Cal. L.R. 183(b). If mail directed to a plaintiff is returned by the postal service and 21 plaintiff fails to notify the court and opposing parties within 63 days thereafter of his current 22 address, the court may dismiss the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Id. More 23 than 63 days have passed since the postal service returned the mail and plaintiff has not notified 24 the court of his current address. 25 Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. See Fed. R. 26 Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110, 183(b). 27 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 28 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days wOASe 6 LOU MVE EAINIT ER MVOC POI PAY ee 1 | after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 2 || objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 3 || “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 4 | within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. 5 || Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 || Dated: August 27, 2020. 7 tid, PDEA 8 EDMUND F. BRENNAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28