(PC) Kindred v. Cabrera ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 RICHARD SCOTT KINDRED, 1:19-cv-00901-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 13 v. AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUESTS FOR A SUBPOENA 14 WUILMER CABRERA, et al., (Docs. 5, 11) 15 Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 16 Plaintiff’s complaint was recently screened and found to be devoid of a cognizable claim. 17 (Doc. 7.) Plaintiff was then ordered to file a first amended complaint, a notice of voluntary 18 dismissal, or a notice of election to stand on his complaint. Plaintiff now moves for an extension 19 of time to file a response. (Doc. 11.) Good cause appearing, this request will be granted. 20 Plaintiff has also filed two motions for a subpoena to be served on the Litigation 21 Coordinator at Coalinga State Hospital in Coalinga, California to obtain employment records that 22 would help Plaintiff ascertain the identity of a John Doe defendant (Doc. 11) and to obtain a copy 23 of a police report dated February 9, 2019 (Doc. 5). The Court finds Plaintiff’s motions for a 24 subpoena to be premature in the absence of a cognizable claim and before the issuance of a 25 discovery and scheduling order. See Smith v. Municipality of Fresno, 1:19-cv-0651-DAD-EPG, 26 2019 WL 6618059, at *3 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2019) (“If the Court finds cognizable claims in this 27 matter and orders that the case proceed to the discovery stage, the Court will instruct Plaintiff as 1 DWC, 2019 WL 2141640, at *6 (W.D. Wash. May 16, 2019) (denying request for a subpoena as premature “[a]s the Court has not yet served Plaintiff’s complaint or entered a pre-trial scheduling 2 order.”) These motions will therefore be denied. 3 Based on the foregoing, the Court ORDERS as follows: 4 1. Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time (Doc. 11) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file 5 his response to the Court’s Screening Order within thirty days from the date of this 6 order; and 7 2. Plaintiff’s motions for a subpoena (Docs. 5, 11) are DENIED as premature. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: September 7, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Document Info

Docket Number: 1:19-cv-00901

Filed Date: 9/8/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/19/2024