Chamberlain v. Baker Hughes, a GE Company, LLC ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL CHAMBERLAIN, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-0831-DAD JLT ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE ) THE ACTION 13 v. ) 14 BAKER HUGHES, A GE COMPANY, LLC. ) (Doc. 31) ) 15 Defendant. ) ) 16 17 On September 17, 2020, the parties filed a stipulation indicating all parties agreed that the 18 above-captioned action is “dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice.” (Doc. 31 at 1) Pursuant to 19 Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a 20 stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Because all parties who have 21 appeared signed the stipulation, it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 22 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, based upon the 23 stipulation of the parties, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: September 17, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 27 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28