Vazquez v. Northbrook Indemnity Company ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FERNANDO A. VAZQUEZ, CASE NO: 1:20-cv-00923-DAD-JLT 12 Plaintiff, ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION v. 13 (Doc. 4) 14 NORTHBROOK INDEMNITY COMPANY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice with each side to ebar 18 their own fees and costs. (Doc. 4) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such 19 stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Because all parties who have 20 appeared in the action signed the stipulation (Doc. 22), it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” 21 Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is 22 DIRECTED to close this action. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: September 29, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27