(PS) Jinks-Matthews v. County of Contra Costa Child Support ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OLUBUKANLA JINKS MATTHEWS, No. 2:19-cv-00572-TLN-EFB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA CHILD SUPPORT; D CLEARY; MELINDA R. 15 SELF; GILBERT BOYD TARIN; and ANITA SANTOS; S L SOTO, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Plaintiff Olubukanla Jinks Matthews (“Plaintiff”), an individual proceeding pro se, has 20 filed the above-entitled action. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 21 pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 22 On September 23, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 23 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 24 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 6.) No objections have 25 been filed. 26 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 27 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 28 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983); see also 28 1 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 2 Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and 3 recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 4 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 5 1. The proposed findings and recommendations filed September 23, 2020 (ECF No. 6), 6 are ADOPTED IN FULL; 7 2. Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED without leave to amend for lack of 8 subject matter jurisdiction; and 9 3. The Clerk is directed to close the case. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 DATED: October 14, 2020 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28