(PC) Connor v. CDCR ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BARBARA A. CONNOR, No. 2:19-cv-02088-TLN-EFB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Barbara A. Connor (“Plaintiff”), a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has 19 filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a 20 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On September 22, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 22 which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 23 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 11.) 24 Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 26 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 27 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 28 1983). 1 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 2 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed September 22, 2020 (ECF No. 11), are 5 adopted in full; 6 2. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 9) is DISMISSED without leave to 7 amend; and 8 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 DATED: November 4, 2020 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28