(HC) Reneaux v. Kibler ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JESSIE LUIS RENEAUX, No. 2:20-cv-02139 GGH P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT OF CALIFORNIA,1 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or 19 paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be 20 provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to 21 proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee. 22 Review of petitioner’s habeas petition shows petitioner has not signed the petition. 23 Apparently, the last page of the petition was omitted from petitioner’s filing. Parties proceeding 24 without counsel are required to sign all pleadings, motions, and other papers submitted to the 25 1 "A petitioner for habeas corpus relief must name the state officer having custody of him or her 26 as the respondent to the petition.” Stanley v. California Supreme Court, 21 F.3d 359, 360 (9th Cir. 1994) (citing Rule 2(a), 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254). In the instant action, petitioner has named 27 the Federal District Court of California as the respondent. This is not the proper respondent in this action. Petitioner is cautioned that when he refiles his petition, he should name the proper 28 respondent. 1 court for filing. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). Thus, the court is unable to consider the petition unless 2 petitioner signs and re-files the petition or supplies the last page (signed) of the petition. 3 Accordingly, petitioner will be provided an opportunity to re-file the petition, or the last 4 page of the original petition, bearing his signature. Failure to submit either a signed amended 5 petition or the last page (signed) of the original petition will result in a recommendation that this 6 action be dismissed.2 7 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 8 1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in 9 support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner’s 10 failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action; 11 2. Within thirty days from the date of this order, petitioner shall re-file a signed petition 12 or the last page (signed) as directed above;3 and 13 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis 14 form used by this district and the court’s form application for writ of habeas corpus. 15 Dated: November 6, 2020 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 16 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2 Petitioner is cautioned that the habeas corpus statute imposes a one-year statute of limitations for filing non-capital habeas corpus petitions in federal court. In most cases, the one year period 25 will start to run on the date on which the state court judgment became final by the conclusion of 26 direct review or the expiration of time for seeking direct review, although the statute of limitations is tolled while a properly filed application for state post-conviction or other collateral 27 review is pending. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). 3 By setting this deadline the court is making no finding or representation that the petition is not 28 subject to dismissal as untimely. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).