Martinez v. National Credit Adjusters, L.L.C. ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRANDON MARTINEZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-00773-NONE-HBK 12 Plaintiff, 13 V. ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE UNDER FED. R. CIV. 14 NATIONAL CREDIT ADJUSTERS, P. 41(a)(1)(A) Gi) LLC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 On November 10, 2020, the parties filed a Notice of Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with 18 Prejudice citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(@i), noting each party will bear their own respective 19 fees and costs. Accordingly, based on the parties’ Joint Stipulation under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)Gi), 20 this case is dismissed with prejudice. See Id.; see also Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 21 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to assign this case to a district 22 judge and then to close this case. 23 24 | IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 | Dated: _ December 2, 2020 ooo. Uh. Bareh Back HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA 27 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28