Serrano v. Nagra ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ISREAL SERRANO, Case No. 20-cv-00882-DAD-HBK 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(Q)(A)@ 14 NAVDEEP NAGRA, ET. AL., (ECF 12) 15 Defendants. 16 17 On November 30, 2020, Plaintiff filed a “Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Entire 18 | Action,” (ECF No. 12). Plaintiff requests to dismiss this action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 | 41(a)(1)(A)Q), with prejudice, because the parties have settled the matter. Defendants have not 20 | filed either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, based upon Plaintiff’s 21 | Notice, this case is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)@); see also Wilson 22 | v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed 23 || to close this case. 24 95 IT IS SO ORDERED. *° Dated: _ December 2, 2020 oe Uh. Sareh Back 27 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE