Aileen Rizo v. Fresno County Office of Education ( 2020 )

2 4 6 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 || AILEEN RIZO, Case No. 1:14-cv-00423-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 13 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE □□ □□□ 14 |] FRESNO COUNTY OFFICE OF OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL EDUCATION, PROCEDURE »° Defendant. (ECF No. 91) 16 17 On December 3, 2020, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and with 18 || each party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has 19 || been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th 20 || Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys’ fees. 21 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case 22 || and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a). 23 24 || IT IS SO ORDERED. A (re 25]! pated: _ December 3, 2020 OF 26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28