(PS) Murphy v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHANNON O. MURPHY, SR., No. 2:20-cv-01688-TLN-CKD 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 JP MORGAN CHASE & CO., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Shannon O. Murphy, Sr. (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, has filed the instant 18 civil action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 19 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On November 18, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF 21 No. 7), which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff 23 has not filed any objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 25 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 26 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 27 1983); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 28 /// 1 Having reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards, the Court finds the Findings 2 and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed on November 18, 2020 (ECF No. 7), are 5 adopted in full; 6 2. Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 7 Procedure 41(b); and 8 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 DATED: December 17, 2020 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28