Haro v. County of Stanislaus ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | ANDREW HARO and MARGARITA Case No. 1:20-CV-00095-NONE-EPG ANAYA, 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 13 DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH v. PREJUDICE 14 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., 15 (ECF No. 24) Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs Andrew Haro and Margarita Anaya and Defendant County of Stanislaus have 18 filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice (ECF No. 24). In light of the 19 stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); 20 Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the 21 Court is respectfully directed to close this case. 22 23 [T IS SO ORDERED. * Eu Po Lhe’ Dated: _ January 6, 2021 /s/ 0 hey — 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28