Prado v. Target Corporation ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MONICA PRADO, No. 1:20-cv-00556-NONE-SKO 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS MATTER AND 14 TARGET CORPORATION and DOES 1 CLOSE THE CASE through 25, inclusive, 15 (Doc. 8) Defendants. 16 17 18 19 On January 21, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation, signed by all parties who have 20 appeared, that this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the 21 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 8.) 22 In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A) provides as follows: 23 [A] plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for 24 summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. 25 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Rule 41 thus allows the parties to dismiss an action voluntarily, after 26 service of an answer, by filing a written stipulation to dismiss signed by all the parties who have 27 28 1 appeared, although an oral stipulation in open court will also suffice. See Eitel v. McCool, 782 2 F.2d 1470, 1472-73 (9th Cir. 1986). 3 Once the stipulation between the parties who have appeared is properly filed or made in 4 open court, no order of the court is necessary to effectuate dismissal. Case law concerning 5 stipulated dismissals under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) is clear that the entry of such a stipulation of 6 dismissal is effective automatically and does not require judicial approval. Commercial Space 7 Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999). Because the parties have filed a 8 stipulation for dismissal of this case with prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) that is signed by all 9 whom have made an appearance, this case has terminated. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 10 Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court SHALL 11 assign a district judge to this matter and thereafter CLOSE the case. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 Sheila K. Oberto 14 Dated: January 25, 2021 /s/ . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 1:20-cv-00556

Filed Date: 1/26/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/19/2024