(PC) Dotson v. Chandler ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TRACY LEE DOTSON, No. 2:20-cv-0710 JAM KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CHANDLER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner, proceeding pro se. By order filed December 11, 2020, 18 plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a second amended 19 complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed a 20 second amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 22 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 24 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 25 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 26 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 27 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 28 //// 1 | failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 2 | Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylist, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 | Dated: January 26, 2021 ‘ Frese Arn 5 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 | sdots0710.ft22 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28