(PC) Howell v. Gonzales ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KAREEM HOWELL, No. 1:19-cv-00822-NONE-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE UNDER FED. R. CIV. 13 v. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 14 D. GONZALES, ET. AL.; (Doc. No. 22) 15 Defendants. 16 On February 10, 2021, the parties’ filed a “Joint Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with 17 18 Prejudice,” stipulating to dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with prejudice, noting that 19 the parties have resolved the case in its entirety and stating each party will bear their own attorneys’ 20 fees and litigation costs. See Doc. No. 22. Considering the parties’ Joint Stipulation under Rule 21 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this case is dismissed with prejudice. See Id.; see also Wilson v. City of San Jose, 22 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 23 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 24 1. Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Stipulation (Doc. No. 22) this is action is dismissed with 25 26 prejudice. 27 2. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to assign this case to a District Court Judge, 28 1 | terminate any pending motions/deadlines, if appropriate, and close this case. 2 ; IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 | Dated: _ February 11, 2021 Mle fareh Yack 6 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28