(PC) Howell v. Burns ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KAREEM HOWELL, No. 1:19-cv-000556-DAD-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE UNDER FED. R. CIV. 13 v. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 14 J. BURNS, FNU MAGALLANES; (Doc. No. 45) 15 Defendants. ORDER TERMINATING MOTIONS 16 (Doc. Nos. 26, 31, 43) 17 On February 10, 2021, the parties’ filed a “Joint Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with 18 19 Prejudice,” stipulating to dismissal of this action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with 20 prejudice, noting that the parties have resolved the case in its entirety and stating each party will 21 bear their own attorneys’ fees and litigation costs. See Doc. No. 45. Considering the parties’ Joint 22 Stipulation under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this case is dismissed with prejudice. See Id.; see also 23 Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 24 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 25 1. Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Stipulation (Doc. No. 45) this is action is dismissed with 26 27 prejudice. 28 2. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate any pending motions (Doc. Nos. 1 | 26,31, 43) and deadlines, and close this case. 2 ; IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 | Dated: _ February 11, 2021 Mle fareh Yack 6 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28