(PC) Strelz v. Jackson ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRADY LEE STRELZ, No. 2:19-cv-00183-TLN-DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 JACKSON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Brady Lee Strelz (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this 18 civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On December 15, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. (ECF No. 48.) Neither 23 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 27 /// 28 /// 1 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 || supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed December 15, 2020 (ECF No. 48), are 5 | ADOPTED IN FULL; and 6 2. This action is DISMISSED for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the local rules and 7 | with court orders. See L.R. 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 | Dated: February 15, 2021 10 /) M “ \/ the 12 ZN Troy L. Nunley> } 13 United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28