- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MEGAN GOODEILL, on behalf of minor ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-0242 - JLT A.M.F., ) 12 ) ORDER GRANTING THE PETITIONS TO Plaintiff, ) APPOINT MEGAN GOODEILL AS GUARDIAN 13 v. ) AD LITEM FOR MINOR PLAINTIFF A.M.F. 14 ) ANDREW SAUL, ) (Docs. 2, 6) 15 Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) 16 Defendant. ) ) 17 18 On February 22, 2021, Megan Goodeill initiated this action on behalf of minor Plaintiff 19 A.M.F., seeking judicial review of the decision to deny A.M.F.’s application for Social Security 20 benefits. (Docs. 1, 4) Megan Goodeill seeks to be appointed as the guardian ad litem for A.M.F. 21 (Docs. 2, 6) For the reasons set forth below, the request is GRANTED. 22 I. Appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem 23 Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “[a] minor . . . who does not have a duly 24 appointed representative may sue by a next friend or by a guardian ad litem.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c)(2). 25 In addition, a court “must appoint a guardian ad litem - or issue another appropriate order - to protect a 26 minor or incompetent person who is unrepresented in an action.” Id. The capacity of an individual to 27 sue is determined “by the law of the individual’s domicile.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(b). Here, A.M.F. 28 resides in Merced County, California (See Doc. 4 at 2), and the law of the state governs. 1 Under California law, an individual under the age of eighteen is a minor, and a minor may 2 bring suit as long as a guardian conducts the proceedings. Cal. Fam. Code §§ 6502, 6601. A guardian 3 ad litem may be appointed to represent the minor’s interests. Cal. Code Civ. P. § 372(a). In 4 determining whether to appoint a particular guardian ad litem, the court must consider whether the 5 minor and the guardian have divergent interests. Cal. Code Civ. P. § 372(b)(1). “When there is a 6 potential conflict between a perceived parental responsibility and an obligation to assist the court in 7 achieving a just and speedy determination of the action, a court has the right to select a guardian ad 8 litem who is not a parent if that guardian would best protect the child’s interests.” Williams v. Super. 9 Ct., 147 Cal. App. 4th 36, 38 (Cal. Ct. App. 4th 2007) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). 10 “[I]f the parent has an actual or potential conflict of interest with his child, the parent has no right to 11 control or influence the child's litigation.” Id. at 50. 12 II. Discussion and Analysis 13 Here, A.M.F. is the daughter of Megan Goodeill and is a minor under California law. See Cal. 14 Fam. Code § 6502. As a minor, her ability to bring suit is contingent upon appointment by the court of 15 a guardian ad litem. Upon review of the Complaint, it does not appear there are adverse interests, 16 because A.M.F. is the only plaintiff in this action, and the only claims are asserted on her behalf. 17 Accordingly, appointment of Megan Goodeill as guardian ad litem is appropriate. See Burke v. Smith, 18 252 F.3d 1260, 1264 (11th Cir. 2001) (“Generally, when a minor is represented by a parent who is a 19 party to the lawsuit and who has the same interests as the child there is no inherent conflict of 20 interest.”); see also Anthem Life Ins. Co. v. Olguin, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37669, at *7 (E.D. Cal. 21 May 9, 2007) (observing “[a] parent is generally appointed guardian ad litem”). 22 III. Conclusion and Order 23 The decision whether to appoint a guardian ad litem is “normally left to the sound discretion of 24 the trial court.” United States v. 30.64 Acres of Land, etc., 795 F.2d 796, 804 (9th Cir. 1986). Here, it 25 does not appear Megan Goodeill has conflicting interests with A.M.F., and as such may be appointed 26 to represent the interests of the minor plaintiff. Therefore, the Court is acting within its discretion to 27 grant the application. 28 /// 1 Based upon the foregoing, the Court ORDERS: 2 1. The petitions for appointment of Megan Goodeill as the guardian ad litem for A.M.F. 3 (Docs. 2, 6) are GRANTED; and 4 2. Megan Goodeill is appointed to act as guardian ad litem for Plaintiff A.M.F. and is 5 authorized to prosecute this action on her behalf. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: March 1, 2021 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 9 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Document Info
Docket Number: 1:21-cv-00242
Filed Date: 3/2/2021
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/19/2024