(PC) Choyce v. Oliveria ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BENJAMIN CHOYCE, No. 2:19-cv-1216 TLN DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 M. OLIVERIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal 18 service. It appears plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that a 19 party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty-three 20 days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and plaintiff has failed 21 to notify the court of a current address. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 23 prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 28 and Recommendations.” 1 Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service 2 | of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may 3 | waive the right to appeal the court’s order. Martinez v. YlIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 | Dated: June 14, 2021 5 6 7 ORAH BARNES choy121 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28