(PC) Anderson v. Unknown ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERIC Z. ANDERSON, No. 2:21-cv-0749 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 UNKNOWN, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendant. 16 17 On May 5, 2021, plaintiff was granted 30 days within which to file a complaint and an 18 application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file a complaint and 19 application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days would result in a recommendation that 20 this action be dismissed. Plaintiff has not responded to the May 5, 2021 order. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 22 court judge to this case; and 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 24 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after 27 being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 28 the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 1 | Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 2 || waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 | Dated: June 14, 2021 Card ke yy a 5 CAROLYN K DELANEY? 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9} 1 10 ande0749.dis 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28